Friday, July 29, 2011

NSW Public Sector Campaign: Fred nile drops ethics and emergency service workers

Media_httpwwwabcnetau_aqziy

Nile won't block controversial IR laws
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-29/nile-wont-block-nsw-ir-laws/2816732/?si...

The New South Wales Government has struck a deal to remove the cross-bench threat that could have sunk its controversial industrial relations legislation.

Christian Democrat Fred Nile says he will not be voting to block the Government's IR laws, as the Premier has agreed to take his bill to repeal ethics classes to a party room discussion.

Ethics classes were introduced by the former Labor government at the start of the year as an alternative to school scripture lessons.

The Government has also agreed that his bill will be debated in the Upper House.

Reverend Nile says some amendments may be made to the bill, which could include keeping the ethics classes until the end of the year, but reviewing them next year.

Nearly two weeks ago the ABC revealed Christian Democrats would block the IR legislation if ethics classes were not removed.

Reverend Nile would not reveal further deals that have been struck with the Premier.

Posted via email from My | News

NSW Public Sector Campaign: Workforce revolt | Coffs Coast Advocate

Media_httpmediaapnonl_hsjbf

Workforce revolt hits Coast

ANDREW Fraser's current political honeymoon has come to an abrupt end.

The Nationals' Member for Coffs Harbour may have been absent but his electorate office felt the full weight of public service indignation yesterday over the state government's planned new industrial relations laws.

Those laws for public sector workers are due to be passed by the NSW Parliament next week.

Teachers, nurses, firefighters, police and other public service workers are angry and upset that the Coffs

Harbour MP and his Upper House colleague Melinda Pavey voted for the legislation, which will remove the Industrial Relations Commission's power to be the final arbiter of public service wages claims.

With chants of ‘shame, Andrew shame,' and choruses of ‘in the world, we have the worst member' more than 200 workers carrying banners and signs from the Teachers' Federation, Public Service Association, Health Services Union, Nurses Association, Police Association, Fire Brigade Employees' Union and the ALP gathered in Brelsford Park and marched down Park Avenue to Mr Fraser's office, accompanied by police cars and fire engines.

Rally organisers delivered a letter to Mr Fraser asking him to change his mind and vote against the legislation, which they say will give NSW public servants the worst workplace rights in the country, even below the hated WorkChoices.

Protesters also signed a petition, asking Mr Fraser and his Nationals colleagues Andrew Stoner and Leslie Williams to get rid of the unfair laws or resign and take the issue to a mandate of local people in a by-election.

They say the Nationals' support for the legislation, which caps public sector wages and has the potential to cut conditions, is a particular betrayal because those regional MPs know how much country towns rely on public services and public sector wages.

“For us young guys it's about retaining what we've got,” said teacher Craig Ellem, who attended the rally.

“My parents were teachers and they fought for their rights.”

Police are exempt from the new law for now but NSW Police Association spokesman Tony King asked: “If the law is so fair, why give police an exemption?”

http://www.coffscoastadvocate.com.au/story/2011/07/28/andrew-fraser-public-se...

Posted via email from My | News

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Attitudes toward the Public Service, good info from @cpsu

Attitudes toward the Public Service: What people really think...

27 July 2011, 10:50am

An anti-public service campaign, championed by conservative politicians, commentators and think-tanks is trying to persuade the Australian community that public servants are over-paid, under-worked and inefficient.


But a new report by the Centre for Policy Development (CPD) - Attitudes toward the public service - paints a different picture. Most citizens express confidence in public services and a preference for a well-funded public sector, a position at odds with those politicians and commentators who continually run down the service and advocate ‘axing’ jobs.

About the report:
The report presents a summary of attitudes toward the public service drawing on a range of sources and examining the perspectives of community members, Australian politicians and public servants.

The synthesis of attitudinal studies draws on surveys that have been conducted during the last twenty years by government agencies and researchers. CPD also examined the views of elected representatives by analysing contemporary media coverage and the Parliamentary record (Hansard) between 2006 and 2011.

Key findings:

  • Most Australians support government exercising an active role in society and the economy.
  • There is also strong community preference for public rather than private sector agencies delivering services including transport, policing, health and education.
  • Outsourcing and privatisation occur despite and contrary to community preference for public sector service delivery.
  • Australians are generally supportive of increased public service funding, even if that means paying higher taxes.
  • A majority of citizens express reservations about the current bipartisan determination to return the Australian budget to surplus as soon as possible. Surveys indicate that this is not widely supported if it comes at the expense of adequately funded public services.
  • Surveys indicate a higher level of confidence in public service agencies than major companies.
  • Agency surveys provide an inadequate assessment of client satisfaction. 
  • mainstream media communicates primarily negative stereotypes of public servants.
  • Australian politicians reinforce these stereotypes, expressing distinctly less positive attitudes toward the public service than those of other community members: they are less likely than citizens to express satisfaction, confidence or willingness to fund and regularly invoke very negative stereotypes.
  • Studies of APS employees toward their workplaces and employers present contradictory impressions. Surveys administered by the Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) present a largely positive picture including high levels of employee satisfaction, motivation and sense of personal accomplishment. These surveys also indicate that many APS employees feel that their agencies discourage innovation and that their interactions with Ministers and other elected representatives are often difficult.


Posted via email from My | News

FBEU media + delegates alert: NSW Public Sector Campaign rally tomorrow (Friday) @Newcastle

NSW Public Sector Campaign

NEWCASTLE RALLY TOMORROW – Friday 29th at 12:45pm
 
There is a rally in Newcastle tomorrow at Wheeler Place, Newcastle Friday 29 July 2011 at 12:45pm
 
We are encouraging FBEU members, public sector workers, and community members to support this rally and would really like to see great numbers attending this rally.


DARIN SULLIVAN
President
FBEU

Posted via email from My | News

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

FBEU media and delegates alert: NSW Public Sector campaign @fbeu- Next rallies Kempsey and Port Macq

New South Wales Fire Brigade Employees’ Union (FBEU)

1 – 7 Belmore Street Surry Hills NSW 2010

Telephone 02 9218 3444    Facsimile 02 9218 3488    E-mail office@fbeu.net     Website www.fbeu.net

MEDIA ALERT

Wednesday 27 July 2011

Firefighters protest against IR attack

Firefighters will join protests at Port Macquarie and Kempsey tomorrow against the NSW Government’s new industrial relations laws that attack the rights of emergency services personnel and force wage rises below increases to the cost of living.

 

Members of the Fire Brigade Employees’ Union, in full uniform, will be taking part in a series of protests around NSW in the coming weeks as part of the broad community campaign to fight Premier Barry O’Farrell’s anti-worker IR laws that were pushed through parliament last month.

 

“Every day of the week firefighters put their lives on the line to protect the community, yet like 400,000 other public servants the NSW Government has repaid that loyalty with laws that threaten their wages and condition,” FBEU State Secretary Jim Casey said.

 

“Current award conditions covering training, safety, wages or conditions can now be struck out at the stroke of a Ministerial pen, with firefighters forced to agree to reduced staffing numbers or conditions if they want pay rises that match the cost of living increases.

 

"The O'Farrell Government is offering firefighters a choice between seeing our wages go backwards, or selling off jobs to fund pay rises. We won't see our wages go backwards, but having less firefighters on the road puts the community, and those firefighters who are responding, at greater risk.

 

“It's an impossible choice to ask us to make, and we're not willing to accept it.

 

“Firefighters have a simple message for the O’Farrell Government: We deserve the same rights at work as any other Australian and we are committed to fighting these draconian changes tooth and nail.”

Rally details: Thursday 28 July

Port Macquarie: 8amMacquarie Park, next to netball courts Grant Street, Port Macquarie

Kempsey: 12:30pm, park next to swimming pool, cnr Belgrave Street and Memorial Avenue, Kempsey

Further comment: Jim Casey 0419 267 555 Darin Sullivan 0422 436 044

DARIN SULLIVAN
President
FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION
1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010
p. 02 9218 3444 | f. 02 9218 3488 | m. 0422436044

Latest from FBEU SITREP No. 28/2011

Posted via email from My | News

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Media and delegate Alert: NSW Public Sector Campaign @FBEU - next rally Coffs and Grafton

New South Wales Fire Brigade Employees’ Union (FBEU)

1 – 7 Belmore Street Surry Hills NSW 2010

Telephone 02 9218 3444    Facsimile 02 9218 3488    E-mail office@fbeu.net     Website www.fbeu.net

MEDIA ALERT

Tuesday 26 July 2011

Firefighters protest against IR attack

Firefighters will join protests at Grafton and Coffs Harbour tomorrow against the NSW Government’s new industrial relations laws that attack the rights of emergency services personnel and force wage rises below increases to the cost of living.

 

Members of the Fire Brigade Employees’ Union, in full uniform, will be taking part in a series of protests around NSW in the coming weeks as part of the broad community campaign to fight Premier Barry O’Farrell’s anti-worker IR laws that were pushed through parliament last month.

 

“Every day of the week firefighters put their lives on the line to protect the community, yet like 400,000 other public servants the NSW Government has repaid that loyalty with laws that threaten their wages and condition,” FBEU State Secretary Jim Casey said.

 

“Current award conditions covering training, safety, wages or conditions can now be struck out at the stroke of a Ministerial pen, with firefighters forced to agree to reduced staffing numbers or conditions if they want pay rises that match the cost of living increases.

 

"The O'Farrell Government is offering firefighters a choice between seeing our wages go backwards, or selling off jobs to fund pay rises. We won't see our wages go backwards, but having less firefighters on the road puts the community, and those firefighters who are responding, at greater risk.

 

“It's an impossible choice to ask us to make, and we're not willing to accept it.

 

“Firefighters have a simple message for the O’Farrell Government: We deserve the same rights at work as any other Australian and we are committed to fighting these draconian changes tooth and nail.”

Rally details:

Grafton: 12:30pm, Memorial Park, Prince Street Grafton. March to Steve Cansdell’s office

Coffs Harbour: 3:30pm, Brelsford Park, march to Andrew Fraser’s office

Further comment: Jim Casey 0419 267 555 Darin Sullivan 0422 436 044


DARIN SULLIVAN
President
NSW FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION

1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010
p. 02 9218 3444 | f. 02 9218 3488 | m. 0422436044
e. dsullivan@fbeu.net | w. fbeu.net | skype. darin.sullivan

Latest from FBEU SITREP No. 28/2011

Posted via email from My | News

NSW Public Sector Campiagn Rally in Aubury against O'Farrell a huge success

Media_httpstaticlifei_ighlq

Public workers protest in Albury

26 Jul, 2011 08:13 AM
NURSES, police, firefighters, teachers and clerks marched on member for Albury Greg Aplin’s office yesterday chanting: “We’ve got the worst member in the world!”

Several public service unions combined for a rally at QEII Square that attracted about 200 people, many waving banners or wearing shirts attacking the O’Farrell government’s industrial relations policies.

Mr Aplin was absent on parliamentary business but the unionists left him a letter detailing why they would fight changes they say would severely affect pay and conditions of NSW members.

About 20 firefighters attended in uniform with a fire engine on hand in case of an emergency.

Albury branch Police Association chairman Doug Nyholm, of Mulwala, said the 30 police who attended in blue union tee-shirts were all off-duty and included members from Griffith, Deniliquin and Wagga.

Other unionists took their lunch break or a day off to attend the half-hour protest.

Linda Barclay, of the Public Service Association, said the government was limiting pay rises to 2.5 per cent

unless the employee-based cost-saving could be achieved, a policy that could only lead to job losses.

“I’ve seen a lot in 15 years here but nothing like this,” Ms Barclay said.

Mr Nyholm said the government was bent on “messing up pay rates and conditions”.

Mike O’Donnell, of the Health Services Union, said Premier Barry O’Farrell and Mr Aplin should be ashamed about what they were doing in the public sector.

Michelle Mackintosh, of the Public Service Association, was pleased with the turnout on a cold, wet afternoon.

“The government is trying to smash unions and divide workers,’’ Ms Mackintosh said.

The Fire Brigades Union’s Greg Matthews said he didn’t know of any government that had initiated so much chaos for state employees so soon into its term.

Deb Matthews and John Pratt, of the Teachers Federation, joined in the protest, Mr Pratt leading chants of “shame Barrie, shame” as the unionists marched along Dean Street.

“I don’t know how Barry O’Farrell and Greg Aplin can sleep at night,’’ Ms Matthews said.

Posted via email from My | News

Monday, July 25, 2011

NSW Public Sector Campaign reminder and Media alert: Tweed Heads Rally 12.30pm

NSW Public Sector Reminder and Media alert:

Tuesday 26th July
Tweed Heads
Assemble 12:30pm
Nature strip/grass area near Red Rooster and entrance to Tweed City Shopping Centre Car Park, Minjungbal Dr
Tweed Heads South.
At 1pm march to office of Geoff Provest MP (103 Minjungbal Dr, Tweed Heads South).
Contact – Tim Anderson FBEU (Comrade Marty Maher busy)

In Union,

DARIN SULLIVAN
President

FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION
1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010
p. 02 9218 3444 | f. 02 9218 3488 | m. 0422436044

Latest from FBEU web site SITREP No. 28/2011

Posted via email from My | News

Carbon change debate in Australia - how sad it is (TW: #cp )

A long read, but worth every minute. It just hits the nail on the head for me..... how sad we are becoming.

DARIN SULLIVAN


You shut your goddamn carbon-taxin’ mouth

Sure, the weeks leading up have all been hysteria: Tony Abbott marching that bulldog grimace up and down the length of the country, like a Cassandra made of old leather and stunted dreams, cawing grim warnings of imminent ruin and destruction at the gates of Troy. But you might have expected, once the details had been released, there would arrive a little more perspective.

Nothing doing.

Far from being objective carriers of information, media outlets have been trying to manufacture furore. “Families earning more than $110k will feel the pain of the carbon tax,” warned the Herald-Sun, straightfaced. “Households face a $9.90 a week jump in the cost of living.”

$9.90.

Cry me the motherf**king Nile.

Households on less than that income would be even less affected. Those in the upper range would have their ten bucks a week at least partly compensated, while others would be fully or over-compensated.

The tax, after all, was not on people, but on 500 high-polluting companies. The compensation was to guard against costs those companies might pass on to their customers.

So, no big deal, I said to myself when the details were announced. Surely this’ll all blow over. And then, found myself more than a little surprised when a Herald-Sun commenter (one step above YouTube on the food-chain, I’ll admit) said “Somebody needs to assassinate Julia Gillard NOW before she totally destroys our way of life.”

Just… hold up a minute. Ten bucks a week? Our way of life? Aside from incitement to murder a head of government being ever so slightly illegal (and something the Hun mods should probably have picked up on), the response just doesn’t make any sense. Here is legislation that might make some things marginally more expensive. Probably not much. It isn’t going to drive industries offshore, because things like power generation and mining Australian resources kind of have to be done in Australia.

And yet the hysteria, even when not reaching Lee Harvey Oswald levels, has been constant throughout, led by the paper who defines ten bucks a week out of a hundred grand as “feeling the pain”.

“Social demographer David Chalke said the tax threatened values at the core of Australian society. ‘To an extent it will make people question, “is it really worth the bother?” They’ll smell in this something of a class war,’ Mr Chalke said.”

Ten bucks a week. Core values. Class war. Then, “Generous payments to those on low incomes and higher taxes for high income earners would anger hard-working Aussies.” Because, people on less than $110,000 don’t have to work hard. That’s why they get paid less! Scrubbing toilets is easy and only takes five minutes, while high-level boardroom execs spend 20-hour days chained to some kind of awful lunch machine being beaten with lobster foam.

I also enjoyed “On 3AW yesterday, Treasurer Wayne Swan was unable to say how the carbon tax would affect a Falcon. He also couldn’t say what the price change for a can of tomatoes would be.” The random grocery quiz had undone the Treasurer yet again. “Wait, wait, wait, got one…uh… large box of Libra Fleur? Nope. Uh, Sara Lee Chocolate Bavarian? Hah, you got nothin’, Swanny!”

Then there were the numerous headlines about airfares set to “soar” (geddit!). Well-meaning travellers were interviewed saying higher airfares would make it much harder to afford family holidays. Tres sad, especially when Qantas “said it would need to fully pass on the carbon price to customers, with the price of a single domestic flight ticket to increase on average by about $3.50.”

Three dollars. Fifty cents. They currently charge you more than that for a bottle of water. They charge $7.50 to buy a ticket online, $8 for a cup of noodles, $25 to use their check-in counter, and $6 to board the plane first. The best comment left after that article was, “So people won’t be able to buy a newspaper for the boarding lounge anymore? Good.”

So let’s never hear any talk of ABC bias ever again, because the Sun has well and truly picked its horse on this one. Any online article on the tax was headlined by a video of the lovely Andrew Bolt, telling us it was “the greatest act of national suicide we’ve ever seen.” Funny, I thought that was when they gave him a TV show. There was also a great line about “so-called solar energy” – because now solar energy is just a theory too. Like gravity, or Adelaide.

I am a sometime journalist. In that sense, the staff in the Herald and Weekly Times building are my colleagues. This makes me feel a bit like whorehouse linen. No doubt they all say they’re just doing their jobs, looking for opportunities. Nonetheless, they’re still actively promoting harm for the sake of attracting an audience. Concentration camp guards are just doing their jobs, too.

And with that level of reporting, the effort from their readers is no surprise. “Co2 is not a pollutant. It is vital for life on Earth. Without it, trees will die,” said John. Get that man on the climate panel.

“How much will Australia’s temperatures decline once the tax is implemented?” asked Marty. Well, Marty, the atmosphere takes notes about where its constituent particles come from, so we’ll get a full report from the Hole in the Ozone Layer each quarter. He wears a jaunty hat, and gives every boy and girl a delicious melanoma.

The dumbshititis was also evident in the audience of the Prime Ministerial Q and A on Monday, where the average question could be summarised as, “I’m a person, and I don’t like paying money. Can I not ever pay money for things?” My favourite line, from a surgical swab of a man towards the end of the show, was that because he earned too much to be eligible for low-income handouts, “I feel I’ll be taxed into poverty.”

This taps into a very prominent feature of our political landscape: the constant line from Tony Abbott that Australian families are hurting, that Aussies are doing it tough, that life is somehow getting harder, that the cost of living is on the rise.

Shenanigans, Tony. Let’s get one thing very clear. Australians, en masse, are enjoying a better standard of living than has ever been enjoyed in this country’s history.

And not just marginally, but by a huge degree. Really, along with a few other developed countries, we are enjoying a better standard of living than any group of people has in human existence. We have every kind of food and beverage from around the world deliverable to our doors. We have technological advances that make a decade ago look archaic. We have goods and luxuries of every conceivable kind; cheap and accessible. We have more and better options with transport, entertainment, comfort, place and style of residence. We have the most advanced medicine and best life expectancy of all time.

While there is still poverty in Australia, it does not even touch the kinds of poverty experienced in most countries on earth. Support systems and sufficient wealth exist to cover at least basic needs. The small proportion of genuinely homeless usually have other factors that keep them away from those systems. Being poor in Australia means living in a crappy house, in a crappy area. Maybe a commission flat. It means living on welfare, getting by week to week, not having any money for nice things. It might mean the kids have to go to their friend’s house to play X-Box, or that they don’t get sweet Christmas presents. It sucks, but it’s safe. It’s solid. It keeps you alive. It’s a level of stability and security that half the world would kill for, and even the basic amenities of a commission flat are amenities that half the world doesn’t have.

Poor people in Australia do not starve to death. They don’t die of cold. There is clean water running in any public bathroom. If they’re ill, they can walk into a hospital and be treated. If they’re broke, they can get welfare. They can get roofs over their heads, even if they’re temporary. They have options. If the utilities are shut off, they can find a tap, or a powerpoint. They can make it through the night.

And those poor aside, the rest of the country is doing very nicely indeed, thanks very much. Reading these stories of parents bitching about working long hours to afford their private school fees just makes me want to give their little tow-headed spawn a spew bath. The lack of perspective is astonishing. Their kids are safe and fed and healthy and getting every opportunity to do whatever they want with their lives. They’re not getting sent out to suck tourist dick for enough US dollars to get their siblings through the week.

It should make us ashamed that there are people with good earnings ready to claim victim status on national television over a worst-case scenario of five hundred bucks a year. This is what is driving people into a panicky rage. Five hundred dollars, if you can afford it. Less if you can’t. If you run a red light camera in Victoria it’s $300. Do 40 ks over the limit, $510. If we get fines, we bitch about it, but inherently accept the rationale: the fine is levied as a penalty by someone endangering others in the society. It’s the basic structure of how a society works. We all agree to abide by certain rules as a form of insurance, to make sure that we’re not on the receiving end of the negative consequences of lawlessness. When people refuse to abide by those rules, they’re variously censured by or removed from that society.

If we obtain energy by burning irreplaceable fuel, and the consequences threaten the safety of our society, then surely we should pay a penalty for that (adding to a fund to guard against those consequences). The rule is basic: you make the mess, you clean it up. Ten bucks a week is a sweet deal.

But in being part of the luckiest couple of generations of people to yet walk the earth, most of us still like to imagine we’ve got it tough. It’s that same sense of entitlement that I was discussing regarding Raquel a couple of weeks ago. When you grow up with a certain standard of living, you come to regard it as the natural state of affairs. If someone threatens that state, they are depriving you of what is fundamentally yours. To your mind, you have a right to live like this, purely because you’re lucky enough to have lived like this.

Well, you don’t. So if you claim you can’t afford ten bucks a week, I call Shenanigans, with a healthy dash of You’re a Dick. One dinner at the Flower Drum would make up your year’s liability in one hit. Genuinely struggling people will get compo anyway. But even they could afford it if they had to. Buy one less deck of Holiday 50s a week. Buy two less beers. Leave off the Foxtel subscription. Wear a franger, save half a mil. Remember that you live in a country where drinkable water comes out of a tap inside your goddamn house, and where the power runs 24 hours a day. This in itself is a goddamn privilege.

Because you do not have a right to this way of life. No-one does. We just have the extreme good fortune of enjoying it, and that won’t last forever. We should appreciate it while we can.

Perversely, part of me wants to see what would happen if the sea levels rise a couple of metres, the coastal cities get swamped, the rainfall dries up, the power goes out, the militias take to the streets. Part of me would love to see these squawking indignant right-to-luxury people learning how to live in the dust, scraping out dried plants from the earth and hoarding their remnants from the Beforetime. It’ll be a sight if it happens. Dirty red skies will rise up from the ground each morning like a curse. The only creatures that seem to thrive, the cockroaches and carrion birds, will swarm black against the sand and the sunset, rasping dry songs with their throats and with their legs. The water will be gone. The world will not remember ice floes. And for her sins, for ten dollars a week from each and every one of us, Julia Gillard will hang from the garret at the gates of Troy.


Posted via email from My | News

FBEU Media Alert: NSW Public Sector Campaign - Parramatta Rally this Tues

To all FBEU members:


Please support where possible.


Regards,


DARIN SULLIVAN
President
NSW FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION

1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010
p. 02 9218 3444 | f. 02 9218 3488 | m. 0422436044
e. dsullivan@fbeu.net | w. fbeu.net | skype. darin.sullivan

Latest from FBEU SITREP No. 28/2011


MEDIA ALERT

Monday 25 July 2011

Parramatta firefighters protest against IR attack

Firefighters will join a protest in Parramatta tomorrow against the NSW Government’s new industrial relations laws that attack the rights of emergency services personnel and force wage rises below increases to the cost of living.

 

Members of the Fire Brigade Employees’ Union, in full uniform, will be taking part in a series of protests around NSW in the coming weeks as part of the broad community campaign to fight Premier Barry O’Farrell’s anti-worker IR laws that were pushed through parliament last month.

 

“Every day of the week firefighters put their lives on the line to protect the community, yet like 400,000 other public servants the NSW Government has repaid that loyalty with laws that threaten their wages and condition,” FBEU State Secretary Jim Casey said.

 

“Current award conditions covering training, safety, wages or conditions can now be struck out at the stroke of a Ministerial pen, with firefighters forced to agree to reduced staffing numbers or conditions if they want pay rises that match the cost of living increases.

 

"The O'Farrell Government is offering firefighters a choice between seeing our wages go backwards, or selling off jobs to fund pay rises. We won't see our wages go backwards, but having less firefighters on the road puts the community, and those firefighters who are responding, at greater risk.

 

“It's an impossible choice to ask us to make, and we're not willing to accept it.

 

“Firefighters have a simple message for the O’Farrell Government: We deserve the same rights at work as any other Australian and we are committed to fighting these draconian changes tooth and nail.”

 

Firefighters join Parramatta public services rally:

When: 12:30p.m Tuesday 26th July 2011 Where: Parramatta RSL, Cnr Macquarie and O’Connell Streets, Parramatta

Further comment: Jim Casey 0419 267 555


Posted via email from My | News

The difference between scientific debate and phoney talkfests - The Drum Opinion #ABC #cp

Media_httpwwwabcnetau_gmlgr

The difference between scientific debate and phoney talkfests
Stephan Lewandowsky

Science is debate.

Whether at conferences or in the peer-reviewed literature, scientific debates are a crucial part of the error prevention and correction process that has served science and the public well for centuries.

Tellingly, so-called climate "sceptics" refuse to participate in scientific debates: by and large, they do not contribute to the peer-reviewed literature and they do not present their views at scientific conferences - such as the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) General Assembly, which attracted 3,200 of the world's leading experts to Melbourne earlier this month to debate the state of the planet and its future.

Vaudevillian climate "sceptic" Lord Monckton, who is currently scouring Australia for venues for his theatrical performances but has given wide berth to the IUGG meeting, has a life-long record of refusing to enter a scientific debate, not having published in the peer-reviewed literature.

The public suffers when good science is replaced by voodoo artists who shirk debate, as the tragic South African experience demonstrates, when president Thabo Mbeki fought AIDS with garlic and beetroot rather than antiretroviral drugs, thus contributing to the deaths of hundreds of thousands. Likewise, the global public will suffer for many years to come if the views of people who refuse to enter a scientific debate on climate lead to delayed action on climate change.

Notwithstanding their refusal to participate in scientific debate, so-called climate "sceptics" crave attention and want to engage in phoney talkfests, preferably with real scientists, at their public showings.

Scientists simply live up to their responsibility to the public when they decline to participate in such charades, or when they consider Mr Monckton's rhetorical exhibitions to be unworthy of an invitation by a university.

No-one is out to censor Mr Monckton or any other climate denier, no matter how ignorant or misleading their utterances might be. Anybody is free to air their views; however, scientists have a duty to inform the public honestly about who the "skeptics" really are. Exposing their techniques is not censorship. Neither is it censorship for a serious university to make choices about what information it seeks to promote, and which to identify as unscientific, in the same public interest.

For scientists, there is no reason to engage with individuals in an academic setting who refuse scientific debate and accountability, and who demonstrably have nothing to bring to a debate.

In science, one has to demonstrate credibility before one can enter a scientific debate. Medical students must learn to tell the difference between HIV and HPV before being invited to a university forum to voice their opinions. Budding cognitive scientists must understand Prospect Theory before they can address experts on the effects of wage distributions on people's well-being.

In science, being taken seriously is not a right - it is a reflection of one's credibility and ability to rationally engage with scientific ideas and, most important, to update one's opinions on the basis of new evidence.

A demand to be taken seriously remains farcical unless accompanied by credible contributions to scientific debate.

Climate deniers, such as Mr Monckton, have not made a credible contribution to scientific debate.

Worse, although "sceptical" ideas are always taken seriously when they are first pronounced, none so far have been found to withstand scientific scrutiny. The fact that those same ideas continue to be recycled by "sceptics" identifies them to be deniers, rather than true sceptics.

Does this mean no debate is ever possible?

No, of course not.

Science is debate.

And the door to scientific debate, on climate or HIV/AIDS or Prospect Theory, is wide open to anyone, even occasional travel photographers: all they have to do is to become knowledgeable in a field and subject their ideas to scrutiny by publishing in the peer-reviewed literature.

If their ideas survive scrutiny, they are then worthy of the public recognition that deniers so crave but which they cannot responsibly be given until then.

Stephan Lewandowsky is a Winthrop Professor and Australian Professorial Fellow at the University of Western Australia. On Twitter, he is @STWorg and on the web he and his colleagues can be found at www.shapingtomorrowsworld.org.

Posted via email from My | News

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Media Alert @fbeu: NSW PS Campaign- Albury Rally Mon 25/7/11 (TW: # NSWisconsin #ausunions )

MEDIA ALERT

Monday 25 July 2011

Albury firefighters protest against IR attack

Firefighters will lead a protest in Albury tomorrow against the NSW Government’s new industrial relations laws that attack the rights of emergency services personnel and force wage rises below increases to the cost of living.

 

Members of the Fire Brigade Employees’ Union, in full uniform, will be taking part in a series of protests around NSW in the coming weeks as part of the broad community campaign to fight Premier Barry O’Farrell’s anti-worker IR laws that were pushed through parliament last month.

 

“Every day of the week firefighters put their lives on the line to protect the community, yet like 400,000 other public servants the NSW Government has repaid that loyalty with laws that threaten their wages and condition,” FBEU State Secretary Jim Casey said.

 

“Current award conditions covering training, safety, wages or conditions can now be struck out at the stroke of a Ministerial pen, with firefighters forced to agree to reduced staffing numbers or conditions if they want pay rises that match the cost of living increases.

 

"The O'Farrell Government is offering firefighters a choice between seeing our wages go backwards, or selling off jobs to fund pay rises. We won't see our wages go backwards, but having less firefighters on the road puts the community, and those firefighters who are responding, at greater risk.

 

“It's an impossible choice to ask us to make, and we're not willing to accept it.

 

“Firefighters have a simple message for the O’Farrell Government: We deserve the same rights at work as any other Australian and we are committed to fighting these draconian changes tooth and nail.”

 

Firefighters join Albury public services rally:

When: Where: Media:

1pm, Monday 25 July 2011 QE2 Square, off Dean Street, Albury

Further comment: Jim Casey 0419 267 555

Further info: Greg Matthews 0419 982 178

Posted via email from My | News

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Latest SITREP @FBEU- PS Rallies, Oten fees + Pub Hols. #ausunions

Media_httpfbeunetwpco_kscjd

SITREP No. 28/2011

Inside this issue:

OTEN fees dispute – resolved
2011 Easter Sunday Public Holiday and consolidated leave
Rallying across the state

OTEN fees dispute – resolved

In SITREPs 17/2011 and 21/2011 we reported on the Department’s proposal to cease paying all course fees to OTEN up front and instead pay a member’s course fees on one occasion only, with members being expected to meet their own course costs after that. Following more than 12 months of negotiation and three appearances before the IRC the dispute was resolved this week with agreement that the Department will not only continue to pay all initial course fees for the first enrolment period (which will remain at 24 months), but will also now reimburse members who successfully complete a subsequent 12 month course. This agreement will apply both to members currently enrolled in OTEN courses and all future enrolments.

As part of this settlement the Department also agreed to provide additional support to members by writing to members throughout the course advising them of their progress, as well as providing reasonable assistance where requested. A Commissioner’s Order advising of the new agreed arrangements is expected to be published shortly.

2011 Easter Sunday Public Holiday and consolidated leave

Further to previous SITREPs reporting on the Department’s repeated refusal to recognise Easter Sunday as an additional public holiday, the Union this week filed an application with the IRC seeking orders to either grant consolidated leave to all permanent members who worked that day as Award subclause 6.4, or increase all permanent wage rates to reflect same. Hearing dates are yet to be set.

Rallying across the state

Members across the state have attended rallies against the O’Farrell Government’s changes to the Industrial Relations Act. One member, Tamworth brigade’s Gary Cork, summed up the issue well in his letter to the Northern Daily Leader yesterday where he wrote:

“Public sector workers are now dealt an impossible choice. They can give up nothing and in return watch their wages erode in real terms year after year, or they can sell off their conditions and watch the impact that will inevitably have on the quality of their family life, or they can give up jobs and watch their communities suffer from further under-resourced, under-staffed services.”

He goes on to say:

“Instead of having to make these impossible choices in the near future, many of our state’s public sector workers have instead decided to stand up and fight against these anti-worker, anti-family, anti-community and utterly shameful laws.”

To read the full letter and for a link to images from other regional rallies see below.

Jim Casey

State Secretary

Comrade Gary Cork’s letter to the Northern Daily Leader, 20 July 2011:

http://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/blogs/soapbox-australia-day-in-tamworth...

Photographs from Regional Rallies:

Bathurst: http://www.flickr.com/photos/unionsnsw/sets/72157627236398412/

Orange: http://www.flickr.com/photos/unionsnsw/sets/72157627111680269/

Dubbo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/unionsnsw/sets/72157627230112318/

Posted via email from My | News

Friday, July 22, 2011

Liberals split on climate change/Someone on the right of politics get's it ! #cp #carbontax #carbonprice

Former Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull's latest climate change comments are evidence of a rift in Coalition ranks, Climate Change Minister Greg Combet says.

Mr Turnbull has used a Sydney lecture to urge Liberals to accept and defend the science of climate change.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has previously questioned the science behind climate change and the role of humans in causing it but has since said he has changed his mind.

Advertisement: Story continues below

Mr Combet said Mr Turnbull's position was no surprise, given he supported the Rudd government's carbon pricing plan.

"Malcolm Turnbull has highlighted yet again that he respects the climate science and supports the policies that the government is putting forward," he told reporters in Brisbane.

"Under mature political leadership in this country, if the Coalition had it, it would be getting behind carbon pricing.

"Malcolm Turnbull's signalling very clearly I think that there are major differences on the Coalition side of politics."

Mr Combet said Mr Abbott was being dishonest about Labor's carbon tax being bad for Australia, and was trying to stir up fear among voters.

"At one time he supported a carbon tax, at another time he supported an emissions trading scheme, now he says it's all no good and he's just running around trying to instil fear in people," he said.

"He's dishonest and he should desist from it."

Mr Combet denied Labor's carbon tax agenda was being damaged by comments from Queensland's Labor Premier Anna Bligh and former NSW Labor premier Morris Iemma.

Mr Iemma said the tax was costly and ineffective.

Ms Bligh said the carbon tax deal is not good enough for her state, and in some ways former prime minister Kevin Rudd's carbon pollution reduction scheme was better.

"I simply don't agree with Morris Iemma and I think it's as simple as that. This is a reform that we need to make in our economy," Mr Combet said.

"It's a manageable reform and it's one that we need to make for future generations."

He said Ms Bligh was simply doing her job by sticking up for her state.

"We'll be discussing the issues that she has raised and of course we understand the Queensland government's position on some of the issues," he said.

"But I make this point: this is a very strong package that the federal government has announced to support Queensland industry.

"We're very confident that what we've put forward will work."

Mr Combet denied claims by Mr Turnbull last night that the federal government's carbon plan would suffer because it hadn't embraced clean coal technology.

He said Mr Turnbull's claim that the government had reduced funding for clean coal development was false.

"We've got $1.6 billion put aside for carbon capture and storage technology," he said.

The challenge was not in funding but in making the technology commercially viable, he told reporters.

"Even that has been demonstrated, with the Gorgon LNG project in north Western Australia, which will be the largest carbon capture and storage project in the world, so we know that it can be done," he said.

Mr Combet also promised that Queensland coalmines would be looked after under his government's compensation package, saying "pollution intensive" areas such as Gladstone would receive significant compensation.

"The coal industry's got a very bright future. A number of coalmines in Queensland will receive assistance from the federal government ... to support job security in those industries," he said.

"The Queensland economy will continue to grow, grow strongly, jobs will grow and output will grow under carbon pricing. We're very confident of that."

Mr Combet said Queensland's black coal fuelled industry was in a better position than Victoria's, which is largely fuelled by brown coal.

He says Queensland generators could benefit from the carbon pricing scheme, which would have a bigger impact on Victoria's brown coal generators.

"We're obviously keen to try and get the emissions intensity of that generation down overall and efficient generating capacity in Queensland could benefit from the overall changes," he said.

And he defended Treasury modelling which found the impact of carbon pricing on commodities would be less than one cent in the dollar.

"Treasury ... has a great track record, it did all of the modelling for the GST and of course it has performed exceptionally proficient work in advising for the federal government as part of federal government policy for many, many years," he said.

"We're confident of the modelling that's been done."

Mr Combet also said he did not think media coverage of the carbon tax policy had been unfair, telling reporters he had no complaints to make.

But he would not comment on whether criticism of Rupert Murdoch's News Ltd was warranted.

"I'll leave the comments on News Ltd to others," he said.

AAP

twitter Follow Environment on Twitter 

Someone on the right of politics get's it !

Posted via email from My | News

Thursday, July 21, 2011

FBEU celebrated 100 years of unity. Worth remembering in difficult times #ausunions @fbeu


FBEU celebrated 100 years of unity. Worth remembering in difficult times


DARIN SULLIVAN
President
FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION
1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010


Posted via email from My | News

NSW Public Sector Campaign: Next rally's Port McQ and Aubury

All,

The next Public Sector Campaign rally's for NSW are:


Monday 25th July
Port Macquarie.
10:45am
Assemble at Panthers Club Carpark entrance.
Contact Dave Gray

Monday 25th July
Aubury
1pm
meet at QEII
Contact Greg Matthews FBEU

Please support if you can. More info available on www.fbeu.net, and the Union forum.

In unity,


DARIN SULLIVAN
President
FIRE BRIGADE EMPLOYEES' UNION
1-7 Belmore St | Surry Hills | NSW 2010

Posted via email from My | News

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Me getting wet bottom/left!

IMG_2629 by unionsnsw
IMG_2629, a photo by unionsnsw on Flickr.

On 15 June 2011, 12,000 firefighters, police, teachers, nurses and other public sector workers turned out to Sydney's Parliament House to protest the O'Farrell Coalition Government's radical changes to industrial relations laws that would leave them with the worst workplace laws in the country.

Leading the FBEU MArch on NSW Parliament

IMG_2521 by unionsnsw
IMG_2521, a photo by unionsnsw on Flickr.

On 15 June 2011, 12,000 firefighters, police, teachers, nurses and other public sector workers turned out to Sydney's Parliament House to protest the O'Farrell Coalition Government's radical changes to industrial relations laws that would leave them with the worst workplace laws in the country.

Leading the march on NSW Parliament

IMG_2523 by unionsnsw
IMG_2523, a photo by unionsnsw on Flickr.

On 15 June 2011, 12,000 firefighters, police, teachers, nurses and other public sector workers turned out to Sydney's Parliament House to protest the O'Farrell Coalition Government's radical changes to industrial relations laws that would leave them with the worst workplace laws in the country.

Dubbo rally for your rights at work - 13 July 2011

IMG_5746IMG_5747IMG_5751IMG_5755IMG_5757IMG_5758
IMG_5759IMG_5760IMG_5761IMG_5762IMG_5763IMG_5764
IMG_5766IMG_5767IMG_5768IMG_5770IMG_5771IMG_5772
IMG_5774IMG_5776IMG_5777IMG_5781IMG_5784IMG_5786

NSW PS Campaign: Dubbo rally for your rights at work - 13 July 2011 - includes FBEU members

Orange rally for your rights at work - Thu 14 July 2011

IMG_5817IMG_5818IMG_5820IMG_5819IMG_5821IMG_5823
IMG_5822IMG_5824IMG_5825IMG_5826IMG_5827IMG_5828
IMG_5829IMG_5830IMG_5831IMG_5832IMG_5834IMG_5833
IMG_5835IMG_5836IMG_5837IMG_5838IMG_5839IMG_5840

NSW PS Campaign: Orange rally for your rights at work - 14 July 2011 - includes FBEU members