Saturday, March 31, 2012

Ports Of Auckland Management Rolls Over On Port Strategy

Media_httpwwwmuaorgau_vsydh

Ports Of Auckland Management Rolls Over On Port Strategy

http://www.mua.org.au/news/ports-of-auckland-management-rolls-over-on-port-st/

MUA MEDIA RELEASE 30 MAR 2012
Maritime Union Of Australia (MUA) National Secretary Paddy Crumlin has welcomed news that Ports of Auckland has withdrawn its lockout notice and the unionized workforce can now go back to work.
TAGS
ITF
SharePrint
 

Paddy Crumlin Addresses The Picket Line In Auckland
Mr Crumlin, who met with the Mayor of Auckland Len Brown this morning as both a representative of the MUA and International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), hailed today's developments as a victory for all workers.

Mr Crumlin attended a rally yesterday at the entrance to the port, along with ITF Dockers Section Secretary Frank Leys, MUNZ General Secretary Joe Fleetwood MUNZ president Garry Parsloe and NZCTU President Helen Kelly.

"This is a victory for common sense," said Mr Crumlin, who is chair of the ITF Dockers Section and ITF President.

"It reinforces the fact that these 1998 Patrick-style assaults on workers' rights and organised labour won't be successful.

"It reminds everyone in the stevedoring and maritime industry that the only way forward is to negotiate in good faith for a collective agreement.

"Dockworkers of the world unite in a crisis and they won't allow this sort of behaviour from militant employers to prevail."

During a court hearing in Auckland this morning, the Port agreed to a change of position. The substantive elements of agreement are:
1. The current "unlawful" lockout is now lifted. All workers will continue to be paid until a return to work no later than 6 April.
2. The lockout notice given for an indefinite lockout beginning on 6 April has been withdrawn
3. The redundancies resulting from the loss of the Maersk line will continue to be negotiated according to the collective agreement
4. Bargaining will resume next week.
"The war isn't yet won but today's developments are a victory for international solidarity and all of those who are working tirelessly for a decent outcome in this dispute," Mr Crumlin said.

"It's a victory for the workers who have refused to cave in to the unscrupulous plans from POAL management to lockout the workforce and contract out labour on the ports.

"It's a victory for MUNZ, the MUA and dockworkers around the world who have refused to bow to POAL's demands and the ITF who have kept a close watch on this dispute."

Negotiators will now enter into bargaining and seek a fair and sustainable collective agreement that protects Port workers from any hidden plans management may have to try to contract out jobs in the future.

"I met with the mayor of Auckland and unashamedly raised the fact that I believe that POAL's chairman and CEO are not fit to continue to head a board that is as seriously split over their tactics," Mr Crumlin said.

"And the Council it reports to also needs to be held to account for the commercial, industrial, political and human damage their actions have incurred."

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Friday, March 30, 2012

A letter to the NSW Premier @barryofarrell | #AusUnions #FBEU #NSWpol

Barry_o-farrell-420x0
Attached is a letter from the NSW Premier to the public sector.

After seeing so many public sector workers so enraged by the letter after what has occurred over the last 12 months, I have penned a response to his letter.

DS

Dear Mr O'Farrell,

A message to the NSW Premier

 

A year ago you were elected to government by the people of NSW.


I want to personally thank you for your efforts in attacking my wages and conditions, for single handedly causing chaos for NSW on at least two occasions during your first year when you forced public sector workers onto the streets in their thousands, and for taking away the rights of my Union to seek an independent legal opinion when disputes arise with you as our employer over wages.


In the past year we have seen our rights undermined, and we have watched you dress them up as ‘significant reforms’. We have been disappointed by your attacks on dedicated and professional public servants and public sector workers, who despite these attacks, continue to defend and protect our/your communities.


You and your Ministers know that we collectively are unhappy with your reforms, and should know that a token thank you letter to us as you take away our working and legal rights, is nothing more than hypocrisy.


NSW never stopped being “Number One”, and to pretend that what you are doing is justified is delusional.


Nonetheless we know that the public sector will continue to focus on providing excellent service to the community, as we did long before you came along, and as we will do long after you are gone.

 

The only way you can look forward to a successful year ahead, is to back off and leave your hard working public sector workers alone. Let us get on with our our jobs, and stop patting us on the head with one hand, while sticking the knife in our backs with the other.


Your letter was not well received in public sector workplaces - firefighters, teachers, police, nurses, transport workers, and many other protectors of NSW reject your thank you letter, and call on you to restore our rights and stop denigrating the conditions we have.


Kind regards,

 

Darin Sullivan

NSW Firefighter



PremierMessagetoPublicSector-26-March-12.pdf Download this file

0barry_o-farrell-420x0

Posted via email from The Left Hack

TIME FOR FIRE MANAGEMENT @FRNSW TO STOP TAKING THE PISS | #Ausunions #FBEU

 

Fbeu-twitter_bigger

 

New South Wales Fire Brigade Employees’ Union (FBEU)

1 – 7 Belmore Street Surry Hills NSW 2010

Telephone 02 9218 3444    Facsimile 02 9218 3488    E-mail office@fbeu.net     Website www.fbeu.net

 

 

 

MEDIA ADVISORY

 

Wednesday, 29 March 2012

TIME FOR MANAGEMENT TO STOP TAKING THE PISS

 

Fair Work Australia's decision to endorse oral swab over urine drug tests for employees at Endeavour Energy should serve as a wake up call for Fire Brigade management, FBEU State Secretary, Jim Casey said today.

 

In a significant victory for employees at Endeavour Energy, Fair Work Australia has recognised the futility of urine tests.

 

Mr Casey called on Fire and Rescue NSW management to abandon its stubborn insistence on urine tests.

 

"For the last twelve months we have been arguing until we are blue in the face that urine tests do nothing to improve workplace safety and only serve to intrude on the private lives of firefighters," Mr Casey said.

 

"Urine tests are woefully inadequate at picking up the point of impairment.

 

"They serve no benefit in terms of workplace safety but allow management to snoop on the private lives of firefighters.

 

"What someone does on the weekend is no business of management unless it impairs their performance at work.

 

"Our Union is prepared to discuss options when it comes to drug and alcohol testing but our guiding principles are very clear - the focus must be on rehabilitation and the tests must not intrude on personal liberties.

 

"Until we have those assurances from Fire Brigade Management, the FBEU will continue to resist mandatory urine tests at stations across the State." 

 

Further comment: Jim Casey 0419 267 555

Posted by:

Darin Sullivan
President
FBEU


120329 REL FBEU Urine tests.doc Download this file

120329 REL FBEU Urine tests.pdf Download this file

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Remembering past May Days, looking forward to this year.... | #Ausunions #MayDay #FBEU

Media_httpimagessmhco_jhldl

2010 - Bagpipers led a column of about 1500 flag-waving marchers headed by the NSW Fire Brigade Union and featuring most of the state's major unions as well as students and protesters calling for the liberation of the Palestinians.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/may-day-call-for-a-mate-facing-jail-20100501-u...

For FBEU members: May Day 2012

The 2012 Sydney May Day march will be held on Sunday 6 May with members meeting up with other Unions and community groups at Hyde Park North at 1200 hours. Following the march, the Union (FBEU) will be putting on food and beverages for FBEU members and their families.

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Fire Brigade Employees Union (@FBEU) weekly update via SITREP | #Ausunions #FBEU @NSWFBEU @darinsullivan

Media_httpfbeunetwpco_efufi

FBEU SITREP 13/2012
30 Mar, 12
In this issue:

2012 Union elections
Silence is golden
Nowra to go 10/14
May Day 2012
ESS Claims – the Department’s bad joke
Meal and Refreshment Allowances Update

http://fbeu.net/2012/03/sitrep-132012/

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Who do you think knows more about #Climatechange science. NASA or these guys? | #CP #carbonprice

Media_httpwwwthepunch_imokj

Who do you think knows more about science. NASA or these guys?

Climate change isn’t rocket science. Oh wait, it is.
Via: http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/climate-change-isnt-rocket-science-oh-wait-it-is/

Once upon a time a majority of Australians believed climate change posed a serious threat to our way of life.

Not anymore. Only 41 per cent of us thought that last year, a Lowy Institute poll found. A 27 per cent drop since 2006.

Times have changed. But the climate hasn’t stopped changing. And we’re close to reaching the point where dangerous climate change is as unavoidable as being labelled a “warmist” if you vocally express a belief in man-made climate change.

The former executive secretary of the UN’s effort to mitigate climate change said earlier this week that keeping global temperature increases to 2 degrees - what’s considered the safe climate threshold - is probably out of the world’s reach.

Leading climate scientists agree. No one’s optimistic that the biggest polluters will start to turn around their emissions rates before the decade ends, as they would need to avoid dangerous climate change.

Australia’s climate debate has gone beyond politicised in the years since Nopenhagen. It’s gone mental. The popular consensus that climate change is a pressing problem for Australia has shrunk dramatically.

The fundamental logic that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide trap heat, that there are greater quantities of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere than at any point in all of human history, and that this is slowly warming the planet - is dismissed by sceptics with big megaphones.

And while the Earth’s climate is affected by a variety of factors including solar output, it’s human activities that are highly likely to be causing climate change, according to NASA. What would THEY know about science?!

If you don’t trust them, trust the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study. An independent study funded in part by climate sceptics, the project was meant to test whether the current authorities on temperature increases were wrong or not. It found a rate of warming similar to NASA’s figures.

All scientists are supposed to be sceptical. But when there’s compelling evidence like this, a theory is a fact. Like gravity.

Reason number 1 people stopped taking climate change seriously is because alarmist “predictions” like those depicted in The Day After Tomorrow didn’t eventuate. But reason number 2 is because not enough of us understand how science works.

If there really was a credible, scientific, sceptic case, then the scientific community would take the sceptics seriously. Their findings would be accepted after peer review.

Even if some scientists were perpetuating an “evil conspiracy” as those on the fringes suggest - credible climatologists would take such a case seriously.

The problem is that Australians are disengaged with science as whole. And the rot in our scientific understanding starts, and is getting worse, in high school. Only a little over 50 per cent of year 12 students took at least one science subject in 2010. The number of Year 12 students taking physics, chemistry and biology fell dramatically (31 per cent, 23 per cent and 32 per cent respectively) between 1992 and 2009.

You at least need a chance to get your Bunsen Burner licence to get what climate change is all about.

I mean, ask the operators of the Hindenburg if they’d wished they’d learnt in school that hydrogen blows up when lit on fire.

Oh wait. You can’t.

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/climate-change-isnt-rocket-science-oh-wai...

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Urine drug tests inadequate: fire union @fbeu #Ausunions #fbeu

Media_httpimagesninem_vfcbc

Fair Work Australia (FWA) this week ruled in favour of unions representing employees of the state-owned Endeavour Energy company, who argued that oral swabs should be used instead of urine tests to detect drugs, Fairfax reported on Thursday.

The NSW Fire Brigade Employees' Union (FBEU) says the decision should serve as a wake up call for management at Fire and Rescue NSW and has called on them to abandon their "stubborn insistence on urine tests".

"Urine tests are woefully inadequate at picking up the point of impairment," FBEU state secretary Jim Casey said in a statement on Thursday.

"They serve no benefit in terms of workplace safety but allow management to snoop on the private lives of firefighters."

Mr Casey said the union was willing to discuss what drug and alcohol testing options were available, but said tests must not impose on personal liberties and instead focus on rehabilitation.

"Until we have those assurances from Fire Brigade management, the FBEU will continue to resist mandatory urine tests at stations across the state,"

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

United Services Union - UNION VICTORY ON DRUG & ALCOHOL | #USU #AusUnions

map of all USU Offices Grafton Office Port Macquarie office Armidale Office Dubbo Office Newcastle Office Riverina Office Bathurst Office Wagga Office ACT Office Sydney Office Wollongong Office

UNION VICTORY ON DRUG & ALCOHOL AT ENDEAVOUR

Tuesday, 27 March 2012
via: http://www.usu.org.au/news/energy-a-utilities/236-union-victory-on-drug-a-alc...

Following months of preparation and four straight days of arbitration before Fair Work Australia in February, the hard work in fighting for oral testing over the employer demands of urine testing have paid off in a remarkable decision for the Energy Industry. The decision further differentiates between .05 v .02 breath alcohol limit for non safety critical roles.

Specialist evidence was provided relating to the toxicology of urine v oral swab testing. Urine testing, whilst not only invasive, provides a historic record of what an individual may have consumed in the days or weeks prior to the test. The oral testing regime is more likely to identify active ingredients closer to the window of impairment and restricts any potential for social monitoring by an employer of individuals in their own time.

The land mark decision outlines the implementation of an oral testing regime and breath alcohol limit of either .05 or .02 determined for each role by a risk assessment.

This decision is the first of its kind in Australia. We now have a decision that recognises that urine testing is harsh and unreasonable and in doing so establishes oral testing as the new benchmark. Deputy President Hamberger said in his decision:

“I find that the introduction of urine testing by the applicant would be unjust and unreasonable. Accordingly I find that the system of drug testing that should be used by the applicant for on-site drug testing should be that involving oral fluids. This should be done on the basis of AS4760 -2006: the Australian Standard governing procedures for specimen collection and the detection and quantitation of drugs in oral fluid.”

USU Evidence
Evidence provided by the USU assisted with transforming the disputed procedural matters including casual and suspicion testing as well as privacy issues relating to prescription medication.

Senior Deputy President Hamberger said:

”It is an unreasonable invasion of privacy for an employee to have to disclose personal prescription medication information to the applicant unless and until a positive test result has been confirmed.”

This decision represents a great victory in the progression of technology and the clear recognition of the unreasonable nature of urine testing in workplaces.

The USU will now continue the hard work and attempt to finalise the policy in line with the attached decision in consultation with Endeavour Energy and the other unions.

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Defend the minimum wage and dignity for workers | #Ausunions | via The Punch

Media_httpwwwthepunch_wvywe

Pay day. Photo: Herald Sun

Defend the minimum wage and dignity for workers

via: http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/defend-minimum-wage-and-dignity-for-workers/

Is there something getting into the water at conservative fundraisers?

In the past week we have been treated to leading Liberal-National donor and supporter Clive Palmer accusing the CIA of bankrolling the Rockefeller Foundation to donate to Greenpeace’s legal challenges against his coal mining operations.

Just days later, apparently sensing that “crazy” is the new black, former Federal Liberal MP Ross Cameron waded back into the public debate, to label the minimum wage as a “virus” designed and cultivated to keep people out of work.

However, although it’s easy to giggle at Messrs Palmer and Cameron the fact remains that these are leading figures on the Australian Right, and if we allow the crazy to go unanswered we risk it gaining momentum.

So, let us take Cameron’s conspiracy theory as a starting point and go to the origins of a minimum wage.

The central belief guiding the introduction of a minimum wage across the globe is that “wages ought not to be insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved wage-earner.”

And what Marxist, revolutionary text is this influential quote taken from?

In fact, it was Pope Leo XIII’s seminal encyclical Rerum Novarum. Penned in 1891, it is widely credited with creating momentum internationally for the realisation of this basic right.

Australia was an early adaptor of this moral practice, with the beginnings of a national minimum wage arriving in 1907 off the back of the Harvester Judgment, which ruled that one of Australia’s largest employers at the time had to pay his workers a wage that guaranteed them a basic standard of living.

This went on to become a fundamental right under Australian law.

So much for the shadowy origins and vested interests alluded to by Cameron. However, what about his assertion that the minimum wage stops people from getting jobs?

If you pick up an old Introduction to Economics textbook it may explain that by mandating a minimum wage, and not letting the market find its own equilibrium (i.e. not allowing bosses to pay the very least they can get away with), you create unemployment.

Theoretically this sounds plausible, however like so much of pure economic theory, it doesn’t seem to work out in the real world.

In fact, study after study of similar jurisdictions with differing minimum wages has shown that minimum wage increases do not create job losses.

One of the most famous was the Card and Krueger Study in the United States, which Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman said “found no evidence that minimum wage increases in the range that the United States has experienced led to job losses. Their work has been attacked because it seems to contradict Econ 101 and because it was ideologically disturbing to many. Yet it has stood up very well to repeated challenges, and new cases confirming its results keep coming in.”

So let’s call a spade a spade and spell out what Ross Cameron’s proposal would actually mean.

Australia’s current minimum wage is $589.30 for a full time job per week. If you are sustaining one person on this wage, in modern Australia, it’s tough. It’s near-impossible, if you’re trying to provide for a family with it.

Cameron’s proposal would be to create a new underclass of Australians working for less than $589.30 per week.

Do conservatives really believe this is the sort of country we want to live in?

Australia is a great egalitarian country, the country of the fair go. And while we weren’t the first to introduce a minimum wage (New Zealand beat us to the line on that one), it has proudly been a part of our social landscape for over 100 years.

We have it because we believe that working people should be paid enough to provide adequately for themselves and their loved ones.

We have it because we want to compete for jobs based on our skills, abilities and work ethic – not on how low we are willing to go on wages.

Long may Cameron’s “conspiracy” protect the 1.4 million Australian workers and their families who rely on the minimum wage for a dignified life.

Disclaimer: The author and the organisation he represents have never accepted donations from the CIA in order to advocate for a minimum wage. (Or is that just what he wants you to think?)

Posted via email from The Left Hack

#NSWpol - A State of Mind or Broken Promises? | #AusUnions

Media_http1bpblogspot_gfhvj

O'Farrell's campaign of lies

Posted: Thursday, 19 May 2011 | By: Luke Foley
http://www.nswalp.com/media/news/o-farrell-s-campaign-of-lies/#
Barry O'Farrell has launched a campaign of lies to justify his broken promise to the 110,000
households who invested in solar panels.

Shadow Minister for Energy Luke Foley said, the problem is, it just doesn't add up.

Lie number one:

At a press conference today the Premier said that without the retrospective legislation he has

proposed, electricity users would be hit with higher bills.

But on April 27th Barry O'Farrell claimed that extra money would need to be found in the budget,
not from energy consumers, to cover the costs of the Solar Bonus Scheme.

THE TRUTH: Electricity customers will not pay more.

Lie number two:

Premier O'Farrell implied at a press conference today that the solar scheme, without his
proposed changes, would cost households $170 per year or $14 per month.

On closer inspection, the $170 would be spread over 5.5 years, which equates to roughly $2.50
per month.

THE TRUTH: Even if you accept Barry O'Farrell's dodgy calculations and ignore lie
number one, the cost would be less than one-fifth of what the Premier claimed this
morning.

Lie number three:

The Liberal Party website stated until two days ago that: "The NSW Liberals and Nationals
policy will ensure that NSW leads Australia in establishing a decentralised energy sector, by
honouring the State Government's current commitments..."

Barry O'Farrell has now announced that the Solar Feed in Tariff rate will be reduced from 60
cents to 40 cents, leaving up to 110,000 families out of pocket.

THE TRUTH: Barry O'Farrell has broken his promise with the people of NSW and forced 110,000 families into financial hardship.

"Barry O'Farrell needs to stop the lies and honour his contract with the mums and dads of NSW," said Mr Foley.

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

En Passant @johnpassant » Labor, Labor, why don’t you give me a call? | #ALP #AusPol

Media_httpenpassantco_bcxfc

Labor, Labor, why don’t you give me a call?

http://enpassant.com.au/2012/03/27/labor-labor-why-dont-you-give-me-a-call/

Posted by John, March 27th, 2012 - under ALP, Labor Party, Left turn.
It seems everyone has a view on Labor’s collapse. Most of it is laughable – banal explanations about an it’s time factor to half grasped truths about privatisation. Everyone is offering advice so here’s my two bob’s worth.

Give me a call, Labor, to discuss a left turn. My fees are very reasonable.

The editorial in the increasingly erratic and Australianised Australian Financial Review – its editor, Michael Stutchbury, is the former neoliberal economics writer for the Australian – says that ‘Labor is a captive of the vested interests of militant unions and rent seekers.’

Well, the rent seeker part is right. The mining companies, whom the editorial praises, are the classic rent seekers, along with the banks, supermarkets, petrol companies, car manufacturers and all the profit bludgers feeding on the tax teat to the tune of tens of billions.

But militant unions? Seriously? The figures tell a rather different story, one where the union leadership are more the poodles of profit than its nemesis.

The strike figures in Australia for 2011 and previous years are at historic lows, not withstanding minor blips in 2011. As Michael Janda put it:

When one smooths out the volatility, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) figures show industrial disputes have declined steadily and significantly since limited protected industrial action was introduced in 1993.

Read more: http://enpassant.com.au/2012/03/27/labor-labor-why-dont-you-give-me-a-call/

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Some super stuff actually happens in Parliament | #AusPol | via The Punch

Media_httpwwwthepunch_gbqij

VIA: http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/some-super-stuff-actually-happens-in-parl...

Some super stuff actually happens in Parliament

I sometimes think there are two kinds of politics in Australia. The stuff that gets reported, and the stuff that actually affects people’s lives.

The 24-hour news cycle has created constant demand for new content, no matter how trivial. Much of the demand has been fuelled by punditry, pontificating and poll-analysis, rather than actual news.

While the political journos are obsessed with the state of Craig Thomson’s stomach, Peter Costello’s Future Fund dummy spit, and Wayne Swan’s Three Stooges jokes, you could be forgiven for thinking that is all Parliament ever does. Conflict, not matter how confected, is the fuel that drives media coverage.

As an outsider to Canberra, it often bemuses me how disconnected the reporting from the Press Gallery is from the reality of the rest of Australia. Probably the most bizarre moment this week was Clive Palmers’ intervention in the national debate, with his astonishing claim that the CIA is funding the Greens to destabilise Australias coal industry. I don’t want to give Clive too much more publicity but I can’t resist quoting the old Irish saying: If you want to know what God thinks of money, look at the people he gives it to.

So much media space is filled with these stories, but they are frequently so irrelevant to the concerns of Australian families. That’s not to blame media and let politicians off the hook. Too many of them relish playing the man and not the ball, and have given in to the temptation of planning media stunts, than on working with their electorates. Sometimes there really is not a lot of substance behind the surface.

But on other occasions Parliament and the unwieldy process of government actually delivers, often without too fuss being made.

There could be no more vivid example of this disconnect than the past week. Four significant pieces of legislation were passed by Parliament, but blink and you might have missed a couple.

The mining tax and the increase in superannuation linked to it have got some media coverage but most readers would struggle to understand exactly what is happening. The mining tax is long overdue. Strong mining companies create jobs, but when 80 per cent of mining profits end up flowing out of Australia, I think the Australian people are entitled to get a better deal for their minerals.

The mining tax will allow cuts in company tax for other industries, which are struggling with the mining-driven high dollar. That is good news for anyone working or running a business in manufacturing or tourism. The superannuation guarantee will increase from 9 per cent to 12 per cent, phased in over eight years, giving employers plenty of time to plan for it. There is no reason for this increase in super to be deducted from workers’ pay rises.

The mining tax will help pay for the increase in super, and will also pay for the cost of removing all income tax on the super contributions of people earning under $37,000 a year.

When superannuation was introduced - and every time the rate has been increased since - there has been a spate of doom-mongering about the effect on jobs. In every case business has adapted and shouldered their share of the cost of a decent retirement for their workers. I have no doubt this will continue. A few other measures passed through Parliament last week which will have a major impact on some vulnerable workers.

Truck drivers, particularly those on short-term contracts, do a dangerous and often poorly-paid job. There is huge pressure on them to work unpaid overtime or push themselves to the limit to meet unrealistic schedules. The Road Safety Remuneration Bill will put limits on hours and help improve safety. When I’m driving I want to know that the trucks in the lane next to me are being driven by someone who has had enough sleep to function.

Just as importantly, for truck drivers, the new laws provide a floor to their income, a guarantee of a rate of pay so they are not dangerously pushing themselves beyond the limit.

Clothing outworkers are some of the lowest paid, most powerless workers in our economy. Many are currently working 12-hour days, at as little as $5 per hour, sewing the clothes for high fashion labels. Their pay and conditions have been strengthened by the passage of the Fair Work Amendment (Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry) Bill.

By providing better protection and improved entitlements for vulnerable workers, both these new laws are important steps on the way to secure jobs for all Australians. This is what we mean we talk about secure jobs - a decent wage, good conditions and protected rights at work. That doesn’t mean permanent employment, but it does mean security.

A final, crucial piece of legislation to pass through Parliament last week was the abolition of the Australian Building and Construction Commission. This hangover from WorkChoices was a shameful stain on Australia’s proud reputation as a country which respects the rights of unions and workers - especially the almost a million hard-working people in the building and construction industry who make a massive contribution to the national economy. While we would still like to see the coercive powers of the new regulator removed, the abolition of the ABCC removes a final vestige from John Howard’s unfair workplace laws.

Now, some of these new laws may not have satisfied the Press Gallery’s litmus test for a yarn, but they will make a real difference to real people. Real people like the people who transport the food to your supermarket, make the clothes you wear, and build the offices you work in. Real people with real concerns, who live a long way from the privileged corridors of Parliament House.

Political change is complicated, it’s often not as fast as the media would like, or as spectacular. That doesnt mean its not happening, or the efforts that people put in to create a better world won’t bear fruit. Media coverage of politics tends to under-estimate the intelligence of the average Australian, but over-estimate their knowledge of politics. It also has a bias in favour of stories with conflict and personalities, and against many of the stories that would give people information that is relevant to their lives.

The result is often superficial coverage of the horse-race element of politics and of who said what to whom when. No wonder people think it’s irrelevant to them and tune out.

by
Ged Kearney

Posted via email from The Left Hack

'Bring on your wrecking ball' — #Springsteen back and angry as hell | via Green Left Weekly | #Occupy #OWS

Media_httpwwwgreenlef_slzbl

'Bring on your wrecking ball' — Springsteen back and angry as hell

http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/50513?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Tuesday, March 27, 2012
By Alexander Billet

Wrecking Ball
Bruce Springsteen
Columbia
www.brucespringsteeen.net

Bruce Springsteen is back. And according to fan and detractor alike, he's angry as hell.

Given the times in which we find ourselves, this should be unsurprising.

What is surprising, however, is the musical method he's chosen to express this anger: a sound and structure that is at once vintage Springsteen and new territory for the Boss.

It's what makes Wrecking Ball not only comfortably familiar, but an album uniquely relevant in a way that few other artists of his level can muster.

Reviews were predictable enough when Wrecking Ball's lead single "We Take Care Of Our Own" was released several weeks back. All the markers of an E Street Band song were instantly recognizable. Screaming guitars. Punching drums. An irresistibly anthemic chorus.

And lyrics that walk a tense tightrope between longing for the American Dream and exaltation of those for whom the dream has become a nightmare.

What has changed, however, is the context, the world at large. This is, as many commentators have pointed out, "Springsteen in the age of Occupy".

Once again, little surprise that the man who famously told Ronald Reagan to shove it, who has lent the content of countless songs and albums to stories of the dispossessed, should support the first open-ended movement against American inequality in decades.

Says Salon writer Marc Dolan of a recent press conference in Paris: "Springsteen gave a mixed to favorable review of President Obama's first term, commending the president's hard work on health care and his reduction of the war in Afghanistan, but expressing frustration that neither effort went further.

“At the same press conference, Springsteen was more unalloyed in his praise of Occupy Wall Street, for their introduction of the very idea of income disparity to the national dialogue.

"Significantly, he told reporters that he probably wouldn't take part in the presidential campaign this year, suggesting that it had been more essential to get up off the bench in 2004 and 2008."

That's not to say this is some kind of political retreat for the Boss. On the contrary, one of the common criticisms of 2009's Working On a Dream was that Bruce's trademark hunger was conspicuously absent.

It left some (including this writer) to wonder whether he too was falling victim to a bit of post-Obama complacency.

For as predictable as the vitriol in "Our Own" can seem, there's no mistake that he — like many others who supported Obama in 2008 — is once again mad as hell. This, in essence, is what makes Wrecking Ball a familiar Springsteen album.

The hunger is back, and the lyrics are dripping with indignation against the 1%. What makes the album unfamiliar, however, starts after the opening track's final notes.

From the sweaty sing-along of "We Take Care of Our Own", Bruce takes a left-turn into a completely different side. "Easy Money" dwells on the old world of fiddles, acoustic six strings and gospel stomp-claps for almost a minute until anything electric is heard.

Choosing one, "Easy Money" is much more representative of Wrecking Ball's musical thrust.

To be sure, we've heard both of these from the Boss many times before. His testimonial style of rock and roll is his most iconic trait.

The past 20-some-odd years have also seen his "folk side" become much more prominent (The Ghost of Tom Joad, Devils and Dust, The Seeger Sessions). What we haven't heard before is these two sides incorporated and balanced so seamlessly on the same album.

The distinction is an important one, because the dynamic interplay between folk and rock makes Wrecking Ball an album both steeped in history's abject cruelty and a revived sense of rebellion.

The mournful frustration of "This Depression" and "Jack of All Trades" is surely known by countless outcast working people.

Just as palpable, however, is an undeterred hope that something better is ahead. In both songs, the rootsy, windswept instrumentation is complimented by the searing electric guitar work of none other than Rage Against the Machine's Tom Morello.

As for Bruce, he is clearly channeling the ghost of Woody Guthrie in the song's lyrics: "The hurricane blows, brings the hard rain/When the blue sky breaks, it feels the world's gonna change/And we'll start caring for each other, like Jesus said that we might/I'm a jack of all trades, we'll be all right."

Contrast this with "Death to My Hometown", which takes this glimmer of hope and morphs it into a rage-filled, penny whistle and bagpipe-tinged battle cry: "Sing it hard and sing it well/Send the robber barons straight to hell/The greedy thieves who came around/And ate the flesh of everything they found/Whose crimes have gone unpunished now/And walk the streets as free men now."

Did I mention that the song is angry? It almost seems designed for the "unwashed masses" of Occupy. Most likely, it was.

This anger, and the lyrics' sometimes violent imagery has some commentators nit-picking on whether Occupy has "found its soundtrack" in Wrecking Ball.

It's an oblique concept from the outset, as if any one artist has ever been able to perfectly encapsulate a movement outside the safe pages of a history book.

Tris McCall, music writer for the Star-Ledger, willfully sidesteps the album's most hopeful moments in order to contrast Wrecking Ball with the optimism of Occupy's grassroots. He also makes a fetish of the movement's more moderate wing.

"For every protester who felt swindled by financial legerdemain [sleight of hand]," says McCall "there were many others who simply believed they'd been cheated out of an opportunity to prosper."

At the heart of the issue, though, is the ongoing debate on what kind of movement Occupy will end up being — specifically whether it's a movement that can fundamentally change things or just tinker with the setup.

McCall isn't only cynical about how quickly today's young people are radicalising, he seems blind to how much Springsteen's own ideas are shifting.

None of this is to say that the Boss is just on the cusp of declaring himself a card-carrying red (though that wouldn't be a bad development in this writer's eyes).

He is, however, coming to a simple yet long-obscured conclusion: that when people's backs are this close to the wall, when all other options have been exhausted, there's little left to do except fight back and take the bastards down.

As Springsteen sings on the title track: "When your best hopes and desires/Are scattered to the wind/And hard times come and hard times go … But they just don't come again/Bring on your wrecking ball!"

[This article was first published at Socialist Worker. Alexander Billet maintains Rebel Frequencies.]

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Watchdog finds Kyle Sandilands guilty of breaching decency standards #Ausmedia

Media_httpimagessmhco_hdeqg

Kyle Sandilands has breached decency standards, the media authority has found. It found the comments he made were deeply derogatory and offensive.
Steps have begun to impose a new licence condition on 2Day FM.
From now on Sandilands will be prevented from broadcasting any material that is likely to demean women or girls or face a loss of licence.

ACMA chairman Chris Chapman said his agency's relationship was with 2Day FM and not with Sandilands himself - an admission that there is little it can do to rein in the controversial host. "We do not play the man we play the ball."
He said that if Sandilands or any of 2Day FM's presenters make such remarks again it faces a daily fine of $55,000, possible criminal action and ultimately a loss of its license to broadcast. Though Mr Chapman said this was not "a path we are going down" and that "we have taken the strongest possible action that we can."

Southern Cross Austereo, which owns 2Day FM, said that if ACMA imposed the licence condition, the company would take ‘‘all available remedies’’ to have it revoked.

Southern Cross Austereo chief executive Rhys Holleran said the condition was ‘‘unworkable’’.
‘‘2Day FM’s core audience is women, predominantly young women,’’ Mr Holleran said in a statement.

‘‘2Day FM has built its significant audience over the past decade by broadcasting programs which appeal to women and their interests in a relevant and entertaining way.

‘‘Our difficulty with the proposed licence condition is that terms such as ‘decency’, ‘demeaning’ and ‘undue emphasis on gender’ are broad and ambiguous and mean different things to different people.’’

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/watchdog-finds-kyle-sandilan...

Posted via email from The Left Hack

#Assange the senator would champion free #AusMedia

Media_httpimagessmhco_wcdfs

Assange the senator would champion free media
Phillip Dorling
March 27, 2012
Read later

Julian Assange … admires Don Chipp and Malcolm Fraser. Photo: AP
THE WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, would be a "fierce defender of free media'' and would use parliamentary privilege to break court suppression orders and other "excessive constraints" on free access to information if he was successful in his bid for a Senate seat.

In his first interview since declaring his intention to stand for the Senate at the next election, Mr Assange said he planned to be a defender of liberty and ''the right of citizens … to live lives free from state interference''.

He said he "could be described as a libertarian" and nominated the Australian Democrats founder, Don Chipp, and the former prime minister Malcolm Fraser as political figures he admired.

Advertisement: Story continues below
Mr Assange said his priority was to campaign for more openness in government, what he termed "the politics of understanding before acting".

There were "many things wrong" with Australian politics, especially "increasing levels of cronyism" and "the betrayal of the rights and interests of people … by political insiders, operating in their own interests".

Last week WikiLeaks announced via Twitter: "We have discovered that it is possible for Julian Assange to run for the Australian Senate while detained. Julian has decided to run.''

Mr Assange told the Herald that attacks on WikiLeaks by the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, in particular labelling its actions "illegal", contrary to advice from the federal police, directly contributed to his decision to embark on a Senate campaign.

Mr Assange has been under house arrest in Britain while awaiting a British Supreme Court decision on his appeal against extradition to Sweden to be questioned in relation to sexual assault allegations.

Mr Assange, who has not been charged with any offence in Sweden, fears extradition to Stockholm will open the way for his extradition to the US on possible espionage or conspiracy charges in retaliation for WikiLeaks's publication of thousands of leaked US classified military and diplomatic reports.

Mr Assange was sharply critical of the federal government and the opposition, saying there was "very little difference between Liberal and Labor, especially once they get into government. Labor suffers more from cronyism, while the Liberals care more for big business".

Mr Assange has not yet decided in which state to stand but said he had several options, having lived in Victoria, NSW and Queensland.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/assange-the-senator-would-ch...

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Monday, March 26, 2012

Conservative cash-for-access scandal | guardian.co.uk | #Ausmedia

Media_httpstaticguimc_afdis

Martin Rowson on the Conservative cash-for-access scandal - cartoon
Labour demands independent inquiry after Tory treasurer Peter Cruddas is forced to resign in wake of damaging claims

Posted via email from The Left Hack

The #Tory nightmare: don't say you weren't warned | via Ian Martin- The Guardian | #AusPol #Ausunions

Media_httpstaticguimc_bmxbb

Life under the Tories: don't say you weren't warned
We're living in some nightmarish Harry Potter spinoff featuring Slytherin overlords and magical Lib Dem owls. And some of us saw it coming – but it doesn't have to be this way

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/25/tory-nightmare-dont-say-w...

The anxiety of living under a Tory government is that you're only ever a few days from the next national bad luck lottery draw. You know something spectacularly horrible will be announced next week. You just don't know whose unlucky balls they'll be holding.

Don't say you weren't warned. We told you what the Tories were like, we of the wilted generation, two years ago. We'd seen it all before. We were struggling young parents ourselves in the 80s when Thatcher's deregulation of the market led to class war, video nasties and Bananarama. We told you. You wouldn't listen.

Come on, you simpered, the Tories can't be any worse than that other crate of soft fruit, with the Britpop on their iPods and their impenetrable jargon. And, OK, I too froze in horror when I heard Labour's schools minister Jim Knight announce through his trimmed facial ladygarden that the challenge was "not simply how to divide the cake, but how to grow the cake". They've made him a Lord now, by the way. Presumably for services to advanced metaphor.

However. You see what you did, young people. Yeah, you shunted out the cake growers and ushered in some nightmarish Harry Potter spinoff featuring Slytherin overlords and magical Lib Dem owls. But … but it's not our fault, you blubber, nagging old husks like you kept urging us to remember the 80s and we did and to be honest they seemed pretty cool. That, we say, is because for you the 80s are a grainy VHS mixtape of fish fingers, Thundercats and dicking about in paddling pools. They are not about the disposal of nationalised industry and the systematic destruction of the trade union movement.

This is why we warned you about the Tories. We knew it would be easier for them to deconstruct the welfare state this time round as they spent much of their last time in office loosening the bolts. The print unions and the miners were defeated early on. The rest of the Tory era was spent dismantling a working class power base it had taken a century and a half to build. They had plenty of time. My son was born in 1979, the year Thatcher became prime minister. He was 18 before the Tories were turfed out again.

Local authorities were humiliated, their stock of affordable housing sold in a right-to-buy fire sale, their powers gradually whittled down to bins and dog waste. The Public Finance Initiative, greatly expanded under the auspices of Blair, was originally introduced as a buccaneering Tory programme, an innovative way of "synergising" public and private sectors. In much the same way that partnerships are forged between a desperately broke family and a loan shark.

Look, the reason this government's moving so quickly to divide the NHS into privatised contractual fiefdoms for its mates, and to divert education budgets into "free" schools for its mates' children, is because it can. Resistance has been atomised. Working-class rage, once articulated by powerful unions representing people doing proper jobs, has dissipated. Yet even in the glory days of unions there were dead industries whose dwindling memberships were amalgamated with new waves of collective bargainers. Wheeltappers and shunters bunked in with car assembly line workers.

Of course the health unions, the teaching unions, the public sector unions are doing great work. Alas, the wider "economy" these days is awash with such "silly" jobs isn't it? IT support. Vajazzling. Blogging. There's no hope of reunionising the country is there? You might as well try to unionise comedy writing, and … oh, wait.

I'm a member of two writers unions. One here, and one in the US I had to join for an American gig last year. I had to join. It's a closed shop. If you're not a member of the union, you can't write TV comedy over there. The union takes a cut of your earnings in return for protecting your interests and bumping your fee up to a decent minimum. Every time I get an email from them it's like a message from some 1970s socialist utopia. In Los Angeles.

If you can unionise joke-writing you can unionise anything. People who do "silly" jobs of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your chains. The nail technicians united will never be depedicured. Don't forget the closed shop is precisely how the bosses operate: you're either one of us and abide by the rules or you're out. From each accordingly to their tolerance of unpaid overtime; to each according to their shareholding.

It would be interesting to see how long Westminster could function if the Amalgamated Union of Baristas and Sandwich Fillers called a strike. And the civil servants came out in sympathy. And the drivers and the cleaners and the couriers and the receptionists and the child-minders and, now I come to think of it, the grandparents.

All this guff the government's spinning about choice and the individual: that's what they want. The last thing they want is collective action. They're always sneering about "Guardian readers". Well, we pay our daily sub of £1.20, let's call ourselves a union. Comrades, to the barricades! Or if you're a Times reader, the paywall!

Ian Martin (@ianmartin) is a writer for The Thick Of It. Charlie Brooker is away

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Why I left the Shire: It's like West Berlin, with more bibles and more suspicion | via Crikey #NSWpol

Media_httpmediacrikey_wggih

The Shire: like West Berlin, with more bibles and more suspicion
by Margot Saville

http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/03/23/the-shire-like-west-berlin-with-more-bibl...

"These good, God-fearing types vote Liberal and Scott Morrison, the member for Cook, knows how to keep them happy. As the Shadow Minister for Immigration, he regularly makes statements about border protection and keeping out asylum seekers.

In 2011, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, he made comments in shadow cabinet suggesting the Coalition should take advantage of the electorate’s growing concerns of “Muslim immigration”, “Muslims in Australia” and the “inability” of Muslim migrants to integrate. We got the message — yet another Shire resident who doesn’t like outsiders."

_____________________________

That's why I left the place !

DS
aka
TLH

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Premier Barry O'Farrell to slash workers compensation payouts | #AusUnions @barryofarrell #NSWpol

Media_httpresources1n_fujgz

Premier Barry O'Farrell to slash workers compensation payouts

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-nsw/premier-barry-ofarrell-to-sl...

WORKERS compensation rights and payouts will be slashed to rein in a $4 billion WorkCover deficit and take the handbrake off bosses hiring staff.

Premier Barry O'Farrell will today signal his biggest fight with unions yet - a massive overhaul of workers compensation laws.

With the Premier facing accusations he has been too slow in reforming our financially ailing state, the announcement comes on the one-year anniversary of the government's election.

Workers compensation premiums in NSW are double those in Victoria - and the government says employers will end up facing premiums four to five times higher if the scheme is not reformed.

A NSW cleaning company paying $150,000 in annual wages currently forks out $10,681 as a base premium. Similar firms in Melbourne and Brisbane would pay $3709 and $4901 respectively.

Results: Today's poll

Are workers compensation payouts too high?

Yes
58.32%(1265 votes)
No
41.68%(904 votes)
If the system is not reformed, the government says that employer's premium will increase to $13,672.

"Getting WorkCover right - and competitive - represents one of the most significant drivers of economic improvement within our control in NSW," Mr O'Farrell will say in today's speech.

"We are committed to starting this second year of change in NSW with a process to repair this broken system."

It is understood the changes could include restricting weekly compensation payments to injured workers. About 36,000 workers receive weekly compensation payments, which last for eight years on average - although one person has been getting payments for 24 years. In other states, weekly payments end after two to four years.

The reforms are also likely to target generous provisions for the payment of injured workers' medical benefits, with time limits on those with less serious injuries. In Victoria, medical bills are not paid after 12 months except for the most serious injuries.

Mr O'Farrell will say in a speech today that premiums will rise even higher and employers will stop hiring staff unless he steps in.

The Independent Actuary has told the government that by the end of the year the WorkCover deficit will be $4.1 billion - a $1.7 billion slide in six months. The debt is equivalent to $15,146 per employer and $1326 for every worker.

The growth in the scheme deficit from June to December last year cost NSW more than $9 million per day.

A senior government source said WorkCover was "one of the biggest challenges facing small business in NSW and tackling it is one of the Premier's key reforms in his second year".

"This will be tough, but the Premier is determined to take it on," the insider added.

The last time a government tried to reform the WorkCover system in 2001, unions led by current Opposition Leader John Robertson blockaded parliament and ministers had to enter the building via secret tunnels.

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Deadly weapons: We must ban Tasers | via: Green Left Weekly #Auspol

Media_httpwwwgreenlef_ehzid

Deadly weapons: We must ban Tasers

http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/50486?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Sunday, March 25, 2012
By Paul Benedek

The United Nations Committee Against Torture said in 2007 that “TASER electronic
stun guns are a form of torture that can kill”.

These deadly “forms of torture”, which are now part of policing in every Australian state, killed again on March 18.

Twenty-one year old Brazilian student Roberto Laudisio Curti died after six police officers chased him down a Sydney street, capsicum-sprayed him, and then tasered him in the back.

Police say Curti, who was unarmed, “may” have been involved in a robbery of “a packet
of biscuits” from a convenience store. However Assistant Police Commissioner Mark Walton said on March 18: “It’s unclear as to the involvement of this man or the extent of that actual incident.”

On March 24, a worker (who wanted to remain anonymous) at the convenience store told SBS News that police had got the wrong person and Curti had not stolen the biscuits.

Curti’s death is at least the fifth death in Australia after a taser shooting. Other killings include the June 2009 death of mentally ill Antonio Galeano, who was tasered up to 28 times before dying of a heart attack.

Last month, Amnesty International called for restrictions on Taser use in the US. It said more than 500 people had died since 2001 after being shocked with Tasers.

‘Non-lethal’ alternative?

Proponents of Tasers argue they are preferable to police using guns when confronted by dangerous criminals.

However, a 2008 US Amnesty report that looked at hundreds of deaths following Taser use found 90% of those who died were unarmed.

The evidence indicates police do not use Tasers as an alternative to deadly force.

Indeed, police guidelines specifically rule out Taser use when someone attacks police with a weapon — the one circumstance where it could be argued that Taser use is a preferable, less lethal choice than a gun.

Multinational manufacturer Taser International (TI) defines Tasers as “non-lethal”. This definition is taken from that bastion of non-deadly restraint — the US military.

The definition doesn’t mean the weapon cannot kill, only that it is not meant to kill.

Even police admit Tasers are not used in place of guns. Acting NSW Police Commissioner Alan Clarke told the March 19 Sydney Morning Herald: “We couldn’t say that every time we use a Taser it has saved us from using a firearm.”

The results of Taser use in the US give no reason to think Tasers are a safer option. A 2009 study into the California police found that in the five years after Tasers were introduced, in-custody sudden deaths rose by more than 600%. There was no change in the injury level to officers and no decrease in firearms-related deaths.

In NSW, Tasers were used 126 times in 2008, rising to 1169 times by 2010.

Compliance and torture

Despite claims of “strict guidelines”, Tasers are being normalised into everyday policing. They not used in self-defence, but to enforce compliance and even to torture police captives.

Curti had no weapon. He did not attack or even approach police. At most, he may have been involved in a petty crime. But police tasered him in the back as he fled.

In 2008, closed circuit cameras recorded nine WA police surrounding Aboriginal man Kevin Spratt as he was tasered at least 13 times. Spratt, who was unarmed, was already in custody. He had refused a strip search.

Spratt was tasered a further 11 times in a second incident a week later. He ended up in hospital with a punctured lung. Two police involved in the incidents were fined a total of $1950.

In the US in 2008, a handcuffed man, Baron Pikes, was shocked to death after being tasered nine times. His body went limp after seven shocks.

In 2009, a small, 72-year-old Texan woman was brutally tasered by a male police officer. The assault was captured on video.

Last September, a 19-year-old woman who was handcuffed tried to flee Florida police. A police officer within reach of the handcuffed woman tasered her without warning. She fell to the ground, striking her head, leaving her in a vegetative state.

A 2010 WA Corruption and Crime Commission report said police had used Tasers disproportionately against Aboriginal people.

The WA Aboriginal Legal Service (ALS) Dennis Eggington said in 2010 that he knew of several other Taser attacks on Aboriginal people, including a young, heavily pregnant Aboriginal woman who was tasered several times and a man tasered between the eyes who caught fire and suffered serious burns,

Eggington told Perthnow.com that the crime commission’s findings proved “our people are being targeted” for Taser use.

Of the five Taser-related deaths in Australia, two of the victims were Aboriginal men.

Immediate ban

The inquiry into Curti’s death is another case of police investigating police. The Ombudsman will oversee the police’s review, but it will be the police who will conduct interviews and take statements from their own.

And they will be investigating an issue — the use of Tasers — that police have clearly expressed support for. This bodes poorly for a just, unbiased outcome.

Greens MLC David Shoebridge said on March 18 there had been an escalation in Taser use by police, but there has been no cut in firearm use.

He said: “Taser use has not displaced firearms use to make citizens safer, instead it is being used together with firearms in an escalation of police force.”

Showbridge called for a review into Tasers in NSW, while the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said there should be an immediate moratorium on Taser use.

The evidence is clear: Tasers are deadly. They are used overwhelmingly against unarmed people, against the mentally ill, against Aboriginal people and other vulnerable targets.

Police use Tasers in addition to firearms, not instead of. And they are not used in self-defence, but to force compliance.

If anything, the evidence against Tasers has been understated due to cover ups by police and the aggressive corporate tactics use to roll out Tasers in Australia and globally.

To stop more people being needlessly added to the growing list of people killed, injured and maimed, Tasers should be banned completely.

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Carlo's Corner: Clive Palmer, the CIA and the real extremists ripping us off | #AusPol

Media_httpwwwgreenlef_cbafi

Carlo's Corner: Clive Palmer, the CIA and the real extremists ripping us off

http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/50473?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Saturday, March 24, 2012
By Carlo Sands

Could this be the wall?
Of all the people infuriated by billionaire mining magnate Clive Palmer’s March 20 claim that the Greens are funded by the CIA, it is not hard to image the angriest were heads of the Murdoch media.

Having declared in an Australian editorial in 2010 its intention to “destroy the Greens”, the Murdoch press has worked hard to relentlessly spin a tale of the political party as far left lunatics — old-style commies in green t-shirts.

And in wades Crazy Clive — a representative of the huge capitalist interests on behalf of whom News Ltd is waging its war — insisting it is really Murdoch's beloved United States that is pushing the greenies evil agenda of not destroying all life on Earth.

Palmer probably got a furious call from Rupert himself, shouting: “What the fuck is wrong with you Clive — we said KGB, not CIA! Or did Lee Rhiannon fight both sides of the Cold War?”

Perhaps this is why Palmer was so keen to clarify he only meant the Queensland Greens were CIA tools. They are trying to get their stories straight.

So the public can now know that New South Wales is, as The Australian repeatedly tells us, the home of the KGB-linked Rhiannon and Greens pollies who are fronts for the Socialist Alliance. But go north of the border and they’re all puppets of Yankee imperialists determined to destroy Aussie coal barons.

Talk about exposing the real extremists. Here we have the recently awarded National Living Treasure and the biggest individual donor to the Coalition sprouting to the media a conspiracy theory that comes from the far-right LaRouche movement.

It is this fascist movement, founded by convicted fraudster Lyndon LaRouche and represented in Australia by the Citizen’s Electoral Council (CEC), that claims the environment movement is just a conspiracy set up by the CIA-funded Rockefeller Foundation.

And, behind them, stands Prince Philip. Yes, the senile royal racist Prince Philip, who the CEC accuses of organising a “green genocide army”.

You have to admire the LaRouche-ites determination to invent a truly original mastermind for their conspiracy.

LaRouche must have gathered his cronies for an emergency meeting to come up with that one: “What about the Jews?” “They've been done.” “Freemasons?” “Done.” Catholics?” “Done.” “Giant shape shifting lizards?” “David Icke’s claimed them.”

The irony is this comes only weeks after Palmer furiously denied Treasurer Wayne Swan’s claim Palmer used his wealth to exert undue influence on Australian politics.

To prove his point, Palmer called a press conference the day the government passed its very mild new tax on the mining sector, to reveal to the media the suppressed “truth” about the Greens — and the press all showed up.

The likes of you and I can’t do that. How much of the press would show up to a press conference you or I might call to insist the CIA is, oh I don't know, working around the world to destablise and overthrow foreign governments deemed hostile to US interests, like, oh, say that of socialist Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez? And that one is true.

But we are not worth, as the BRW said Palmer was last year, more than $5 billion.

If you want to get a sense of just how much that is, consider the point made by US academic Michael D Yates in an essay on inequality in the March Monthly Review. He said spending $10,000 a day, it would take 100,000 days to spend $1 billion — or just under 274 years.

So if Palmer earned not one more cent and spent $10,000 every day, he would finally run out of cash sometime around 3382AD.

Keep Clive Palmer in mind next time sometime tries to tell you that the great thing about capitalism is it rewards intelligence and natural talent.

It also puts into perspective the media’s reporting over the nasty fight between the children of multi-billionaire mining giant Gina Rinehart over their inheritance. And remember, that in all the media gossip about this grab-for-more-cash-than-anyone-could-dream-of-spending-in-a-dozen-lifetimes, no one pointed out that no one involved has done a thing to earn one cent.

It is like watching a group of seagulls squabbling over a stolen chip — only the chip is the size of China.

And where does all of this mindboggling wealth come from? Finite resources that, politicians from both sides keep telling us, belong to “all of us”.

In announcing his opposition to Labor’s mild tax, Western Australian Premier Colin Barnett said: “These minerals belong to the men, women and children of Western Australia.”

To test if this is true, all WA citizens should try going to their nearest iron ore mine and taking away a couple of lumps.

The resources don't belong to us: they belong to the Rinehart's and Palmer’s — and to less buffoonish caricature capitalists such as the owners of BHP, Rio Tinto and Xstrata.

If we want to own the finite resources, we should take them back. Once the enormous wealth belongs to us all, we could use it to help fund the reorganisation of the economy away from the destructive fossil fuel economy the mining industry feeds and towards one that can deal with the looming climate crisis — before it is too late.

Then again, maybe this call for a fair, ecologically sustainable society is just what the CIA is paying me to say.

[Read more Carlo's Corner columns] http://www.greenleft.org.au/taxonomy/term/532

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Friday, March 23, 2012

Everyday Hero Australia @SamuelMorrisFnd :The 2012 Sydney Morning Herald Half Marathon presented the Samuel Morris Foundation! #AusUnions @fbeu

Media_httpwwweveryday_bqyik

Every year an average of 35 Australian Children aged 0-4 lose their lives to drowning and hundreds more are admitted to hospital after near drowning accidents.... around one quarter of those admitted to hospital will experience an Hypoxic Brain Injury and be left with disabilities for life.

Running for the Samuel Morris Foundation you can help give these kids the best possible quality of life, and help us prevent other children and their families joining this tragic journey.

Please donate and support Mick Morris in this event ! - I did.

http://www.everydayhero.com/samuel_morris_foundation

Posted via email from The Left Hack

Fire and Rescue NSW / firefighters update: This weeks Sitrep @FBEU | #FBEU #AusUnions #NSWpol @NSWFBEU

Media_httpfbeunetwpco_fkxrs

2012 Union elections

Further to the ten members elected unopposed as reported in SITREP 11/2012 (see the Returning Officer’s letter confirming this), four more candidates were declared elected unopposed by the NSW Electoral Commission (NSWEC) when they were the sole remaining candidates for their offices by the deadline for withdrawal of nominations yesterday.

SCOM Office Member elected

Sydney Central Sub-Branch Secretary (ME1) Wes Smith (1 A)

Sydney Central West Sub-Branch Secretary MW2) Leighton Drury (27 A)

Sydney North Sub-Branch Secretary (ME2) Stephen Cresswell (36 A)

Sydney South West Sub-Branch Secretary (MS3) Richard Neville (HART S/R)

The NSWEC will now conduct a postal ballot of all financial members of the Union for the three remaining contested State Committee of Management positions, as follows:

SCOM Office Candidates

Senior Vice President John Henry (77 C), Travis Broadhurst (36 C)

Junior Vice President Jason Morgan (374 S/R), Matthew Murray (10 A)

Retained Sub-Branch Phillip Gardner (72), Marina Findeis (77)

The NSWEC will post your voting material to the address shown in the Union’s records on Thursday 29 March. The ballot will close at 5pm on Thursday 12 April 2012. Members are urged to notify the Union of any change of address. If you are not sure, then you can check if the Union has your current address by phoning Alison or Julie at the Union Office on 9218 3444, or by emailing office@fbeu.net

Baulkham Hills matrix distance – are we there yet?

The Department has once again been caught out verballing the Union, advising members that No. 67 Stn, Baulkham Hills is not on the matrix because the Union has not signed off on the matrix distances. Unsurprisingly, this is simply not true – it’s the Union who’s waiting for a response from the Department.

Members can see from the Department’s letter dated 29 November 2011 and our response dated 2 December 2011 that the Department is attempting to shortchange members by calculating matrix distances according to the shortest distance possible rather than the “actual distance necessarily and reasonably travelled” as provided by the Award.

If the Department had its way here, it would see members in some cases taking a much longer route, using every back street in Sydney, just because the overall distance was shorter than using major arterial motorways and highways that would cut down travel time. Members are encouraged to read both letters and see for themselves where the hold up lies.

More to follow.

Meal and Refreshment Allowances Update

This dispute returned to the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) yesterday.

What is agreed

Independent advice obtained by the Union confirms that the incident meal and refreshment allowances are taxable, but that the overtime meal allowance payable to permanent members under subclause 10.3.1.2 is not taxable. The Union also accepts that the ATO requires the allowances which are taxable to be taxed at the time of payment (ie, the full allowance can’t be paid now and the tax component paid later).

What is not agreed

The Union argues that meal and refreshment allowances should continue to be paid out of petty cash, as per clause 10.4.1 of the Permanent Award and clause 8.3.1 of the Retained Award. The Department is now arguing that a Treasury Direction against the use of petty cash overrides the Awards. The IRC’s Justice Haylen appeared as surprised by this line of argument as we were, but invited the Department’s advocates to go away and seek further advice on that before the matter returns to the IRC on 10 April.

The Department is also arguing that the incident meal and refreshment allowances can’t be paid out of petty cash because the Station Commander will have no way of knowing how to calculate the correct rate of tax for each member. The Union argues that this can be overcome by taxing the allowances at the highest marginal rax rate of 46.5%, with any excess tax paid being returned to members with each year’s tax return.

The Department is also standing by its intention to cease payment of the overtime meal allowances from petty cash and to instead deposit the allowance (which both parties agree is not taxed) into members’ bank accounts asap after the claim has been approved. This would not occur before the next business day at the absolute earliest, and would more likely take several days to process and appear in your account. The Union is arguing the obvious, noting that it is pointless to give some an allowance to allow them to purchase their dinner 24 hours or more after the event. We have also rejected the suggestions that members should be able to just borrow the money off someone else, or carry an extra $30 on them in case they land some unexpected overtime.

Finally, the Union’s advice is that the incident and meal and refreshment allowances, which we agree are taxable, are also superable (ie, they attract an extra 9% in employer contributions to your superannuation account). Members will recall last year’s lump-sum award payments which the Department initially argued were not superable, only to concede the point (and $70,000 in additional members’ super) after continued Union pressure. While payment in this instance may take longer (we will need to engage tax consultants to seek a ruling on behalf of all members from the ATO), we expect the result to be the same.

Where to from here?

The Union advised the IRC that management was already standing over some Station Officers and Captains who had continued to observe the award and pay the allowances from petty cash. The Judge clearly indicated his view that there should be no threat of disciplinary action while this matter is sorted, but the Department refused to confirm that this would be the case. The Union therefore has no option but to take the matter into our own hands to protect our members and to make the Department’s unworkable systems actually work. Accordingly, all members are hereby instructed that:

all incident and overtime meal and refreshment allowance claims are to continue to be paid through petty cash;
for each incident meal allowance payment of $26.45, members are to be paid an after tax incident meal allowance payment of $14.15. Tax of $12.30 is to be withheld and left in petty cash;
for each incident refreshment allowance payment of $13.25, members are to be paid an after tax incident refreshment payment of $7.10. Tax of $6.15 is to be withheld and left in petty cash;
The overtime meal allowance for permanent members is not taxable and remains at $26.45, which should be paid in full from petty cash; and
Every member is to record their own payments received and tax withheld on this form, which they should retain for their own records.
This instruction shall remain in place until notified otherwise by the State Secretary.

Super guarantee to increase from 9% to 12%

The passage of the superannuation and minerals resource rent tax Bills through Federal Parliament this week will deliver working Australians tens of thousands of dollars more in their retirement savings, and ensure the spoils of the mining boom are more fairly spread. Unions have campaigned long and hard to lift the super guarantee because 9% super is not enough to provide an adequate income in retirement.

Although the increase in employer funded superannuation contributions is good news, it is being phased in too slowly. The first increase of 0.25% is scheduled for 1 July 2013, and the 12% mark won’t be reached until 2020. Whether these increases survive the probable election of an Abbott Government is another question. The Liberals have form on this. The Howard Government backflipped on increasing the super guarantee to 15%, despite promising to do so prior to its election in 1996.

O’Farrell’s war on workers – update.

I will be meeting with Premier O’Farrell next Wednesday as a part of a Unions NSW delegation over the government’s latest IR changes, including massive increases in fines (up to $220,000 per day) for industrial action.

This will follow the meetings held between numerous FBEU members and officials and Government MPs over this last week to ensure they are aware of the appalling impact the Commission of Audit’s recommendations would have on frontline services in NSW. At a community meeting in Parramatta on Wednesday O’Farrell made a commitment to not implement one of the worst aspects of the report – making safe and effective minimum crewing a question of ‘managerial prerogative’ – in response to a query from one of our newly-elected officials. It’ll require all of us to hold the Premier to his promise.

Jim Casey

State Secretary

Posted via email from The Left Hack